undertowTitle: U is for Undertow

Author:  Sue Grafton

Genre/Pages: Mystery, Fiction, Series/416

Publication: Putnam; December 1, 2009

Rating: 3.5 BOOKMARKS

Source: Library

After reading the 20 books in the Kinsey Milhone series that precede this one, I have to admit that I’d given up hope on my favorite 80s gumshoe.  Miraculously, with her 21st installment, Grafton has pumped new life into Kinsey and into the series! 

Using flashbacks, Sue Grafton skillfully weaves the past into Kinsey’s present.  Michael Sutton comes to see private eye Kinsey Milhone with a hazy childhood memory that may have some bearing on an unsolved missing child case dating back 21 years to 1967 (the series is set in the 1980s in Santa Teresa, CA).

Sutton is almost immediately characterized as an unreliable source and everything he says is suspect.  Did he really see two pirates burying treasure in the woods behind a friend’s house or was something more sinister afoot?

Kinsey manages to unravel the mystery with her tenacity, pulling on short threads of evidence until something gives.  The flashbacks gave another dimension to the story and provided much needed back-story and narrative perspective. 

At 416 pages, this isn’t a light read, but it was quick.  Grafton foreshadows a good deal of  the plot twists and there isn’t a huge reveal in the last few pages.  

The last several installments of this series weren’t doing it for me and I almost skipped this one all together.  I’m glad I didn’t–it’s interesting, cleverly told, and has a fresh storyline that I enjoyed.  The regular cast of characters make appearances, including a family meeting with Kinsey’s grandmother! 

I’ll be looking forward to V is for… sometime next year!

Last week, Janet Evanovich’s most recent Stephanie Plum novel, Finger Lickin’ Fifteen, was released and I wasn’t first on line to purchase it.  In fact, it’s now 9 days later and I still haven’t picked up the book–and I saw it in my travels to Costco, Target, and Borders yesterday.

fifteen

Evanovich’s ‘numbers novels’ (and more recent marketing coup of ’between the numbers novels’) don’t hold the same reading magic for me.  I know that she tries to keep the stories fresh by introducing new characters and varied story lines but I’m just not as smitten anymore. 

The stagnating state of Stephanie’s romantic interests is a Catch-22.  If she decides between Ranger and Morelli all the sexual tension and suspense will evaporate; if she continues to waffle, Evanovich runs the risk of frustrating her readers.

Sue Grafton’s  Kinsey Milhone series  lost its luster for me a few years ago.  How long can her wonderful landlord Henry really live?  He’s well into his 80s or 90s by my count!  Will Kinsey ever settle down?  These novels are a bit more problematic because they lack strong supporting characters.  Aside from Rosie, Henry, and his siblings, Kinsey doesn’t have any real mainstays. 

Patricia Cornwell’s Kay Scarpetta novels have held up reasonably well because she doesn’t pump them out with the same frequency as Evanovich.  Her books also have a number of dynamic characters who continue to grow and change, creating fresh story lines and sub-plots. 

There’s nothing inherently wrong with serial novels; I actually love to read them because I feel comfy in the protagonists’ lives.  I know their habits, their friends, and their back stories, but worry about overstaying my welcome.

It stands to reason that many serial authors are motivated by publishers and agents who strongly encourage them to ’strike while the financial iron is hot’.  Perhaps fans would be devastated if Stephanie Plum turned in her handcuffs and pepper spray for wedded bliss and a brood of kids with Morelli.  Who am I to say? 

I don’t have any answers and just want to know what you think about serial novels.  Is there a ‘right’ time to kill them off?  If the writing is still fresh and the characters are still interesting, should the books go on to eternity? In your opinion, which serials should have been killed off long ago?  Take a ’stab’ at this and tell me what you think!

From childhood, I always enjoyed a good mystery.  Clue was my favorite board game and scavenger hunts were adored.  What started my obsession with mysteries?  I’m not sure exactly, but if forced to hazard a guess I’d say Nancy Drew, Encyclopedia Brown, and Cam Jansen are responsible.  All characters in mystery series of my childhood, they inspired my love for the “Whodunnit”. 

Series writing is great because after a while, the characters begin to feel like extensions of my family or circle of friends–I love the familiarity!  I still enjoy mystery series today–they are fun, quick, and great for in-the-car listening.  A few of my favorite ’sleuths’ (for not all of them are technically detectives) are:

  • Archy McNally (Lawrence Sanders/Vincent Lardo)
  • Stephanie Plum (Janet Evanovich)
  • Jim Qwilleran (Lilian Jackson Braun)
  • Alex Delaware and Milo Sturgis (Jonathan Kellerman)
  • Kay Scarpetta and Pete Marino (Patricia Cornwell)
  • Kinsey Milhone (Sue Grafton)

Does the mystery genre do it for you?  Any suggestions for great series detectives I’ve missed?  I hate to admit it, but I never got into Sherlock Holmes or any Agatha Christie (except the movie versions of Hercule Poirot with Peter Ustinov).

© N.A.M., 2009-2010. Please don't steal. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to me. Thank you.